Biggest Difference Between Bad Art and Great Art by UCLA Professor Richard Walter | Summary of Information Related to what makes good art

by Alex Tran

Are you looking for information related to this what makes good art? see Biggest Difference Between Bad Art and Great Art by UCLA Professor Richard Walter in this article.

Biggest Difference Between Bad Art and Great Art by UCLA Professor Richard Walter | News what makes good art Latest

Let’s See

Also you can see more what makes good art related information by https://lineamarco.com/tips/ share here.

Biggest Difference Between Bad Art and Great Art by UCLA Professor Richard Walter and images related to this what makes good art.

Biggest Difference Between Bad Art and Great Art by UCLA Professor Richard Walter

Biggest Difference Between Bad Art and Great Art by UCLA Professor Richard Walter


what makes good art and Content related to topic.

BUY THE BOOK – ESSENTIALS OF SCREENWRITING:
The Art, Craft, and Business Of Film and Television Writing

In this Film Courage video interview, UCLA Screenwriting Chair shares the biggest different between bad art and great art.

MORE VIDEOS WITH RICHARD WALTER

CONNECT WITH RICHARD WALTER

CONNECT WITH FILM COURAGE

BUSINESS INQUIRIES

SUBSCRIBE TO THE FILM COURAGE YOUTUBE CHANNEL

LISTEN TO THE FILM COURAGE PODCAST

PROMOTE YOUR MOVIE, WEBSERIES, OR PRODUCT ON FILM COURAGE

SUPPORT FILM COURAGE

Stuff we use:
CAMERA – This is the camera we have used to film 90+% of our interviews (over 200 interviews and counting) It continues to be our workhorse –

LENS – Most people ask us what camera we use, no one ever asks about the lens which filmmakers always tell us is more important. This lens was a big investment for us and one we wish we could have made sooner. Started using this lens at the end of 2013 –

AUDIO

Rode VideoMic Pro – The Rode mic helps us capture our backup audio. It also helps us sync up our audio in post

Audio Recorder – If we had to do it all over again, this is probably the first item we would have bought –

LIGHTS – Although we like to use as much natural light as we can, we often enhance the lighting with this small portable light. We have two of them and they have saved us a number of times –

COMPUTER – Our favorite computer, we each have one and have used various models since 2010 –

*These are affiliate links, by using them you can help support this channel.

#artists #art #UCLA .

>> In addition to viewing this content you can find more information provided by us: See more good information here.

Content relevant to category what makes good art.

#Biggest #Difference #Bad #Art #Great #Art #UCLA #Professor #Richard #Walter.

richard walter,essentials of screenwriting,ucla,screenwriting,professor,film,movies,television,movie,interview,dustin lance black,alexander payne,screenplay,script,screenwriting class,graduate program,los angeles,434,filmcourage,film courage.

Biggest Difference Between Bad Art and Great Art by UCLA Professor Richard Walter.

what makes good art.

With these Shares on this what makes good art topic will be useful to you. Thank you very much for watching.

You may also like

29 comments

Plywoodcar Johnson 12/08/2021 - 01:41

U feel how heavily time weighs on you. That is a good way of judging it. I compare it to nature. If you are as absorbed by the art as you are by a magnificent landscape that you can explore and investigate and not even explain, then it is good. Usually it requires rather a big, tasteful piece that tells a story.

Reply
Sushil Ganesh 12/08/2021 - 01:41

Is this from the Frasier reboot?

Reply
Animetions 12/08/2021 - 01:41

There is no such thing as bad art. Everyone just sees differently. Different strokes for different folks.

Reply
Christian Morgan Backman 12/08/2021 - 01:41

So if I understand, if I listen to Metallica or Iron Maiden , it’s Art ( difficult to sleep 😅) but if a have a snooze listening to Mozart or Schubert it’s not Art 😂

Reply
Alexander Tso 12/08/2021 - 01:41

this is one of those rare times the YouTube comments are wiser than the “wisdom” in the video

Reply
Will 12/08/2021 - 01:41

The greatest art comes out of moments of intense stress or heightened emotion. Music or sculpture or digital animation or painting (or whatever) can be done "well enough" by a great many people, but when an album or videogame etc. transcends it's medium to become a true piece of "art," you know one of the artists (if there were multiple involved) was straight up channeling some inner despair or rage or bliss (i.e. extreme happiness, not ignorance lol) that inspired their creation of that particular piece of art – even if indirectly.

Reply
Artur Perzyna 12/08/2021 - 01:41

He said it all in 20s and repeated 4 or more times. Nothing new.

Reply
Bob's Big Boy 12/08/2021 - 01:41

stop supporting amazon retards

Reply
Dee Mac 12/08/2021 - 01:41

You're welcome to join our new and quickly expanding group of fellow artists who will happily give, and accept, constructive critiques for any type of art. Join us here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/ArtCrits

Reply
dorfman jones 12/08/2021 - 01:41

Given this professor's age, he's more prone to nodding off than he was 20 years earlier. But that doesn't mean the films are getting worse. It's just faulty thinking on his part. And there's a big difference between viewing a static image like a painting, which after all — is MEANT to be static — and following a two hour narrative film or stage play — or a Mahler symphony for that matter. I love Mahler, but a lot of Walter's UCLA students might drift off after listening to it for 15 minutes. Good or bad art is a tough nut to crack. The best you can say is that if you are seeing something that has been deliberately preserved for a hundred and fifty years or 500 years in order for you to see it, than a whole culture developing and altering itself in the interim, thought it worthwhile to do so. That's what it takes to keep something going.

Reply
Dejan Markovic 12/08/2021 - 01:41

Who's this guy? He spent one minute in front of the Mona Lisa? What a fkin idiot. No, he's not an idiot for having spent one minute in front of it..he's an idiot for using that as an example to reinforce his own argument…like nobody should have a reason to spend more than a minute in front of a painting. I've moved four times and I've always hung the same two paintings everywhere I've lived since childhood…I'm 35 now and the first time I admired them for about 15 minutes was when I was seven…the last time was about ten days ago…and he saw the Mona Lisa live and he's implying that it's only worth watching for a minute? I bet I don't like any of his movies. Let's see who this pretentious poser is. Richard Wa…never heard of him. Fk this guy.

Reply
COIN COLLECTING FUN 12/08/2021 - 01:41

Very good points. I'm looking forward to producing great 👍 art!!

Reply
Hewes Abstract Art 12/08/2021 - 01:41

Some art made years ago was bad art to some people back then. Today's bad art will be good art in years to come. Well, not all of it but some of it. Look a Van Gogh, they didn't like his art at all, and today well it's time tested, it's good, etc., etc…

Reply
Charles Reyna 12/08/2021 - 01:41

Sorry, he's not giving the viewer the option of making up their own minds. Very cynical.

Reply
Charity 12/08/2021 - 01:41

I want to know what he thinks is considered lousy

Reply
Annie 12/08/2021 - 01:41

Well, I beg to disagree. I don't think most art is bad. And I don't think art has to change your life forever to be classified as good art. This is coming from a man who only spent one minute looking at Mona Lisa in Louvre. I rest my case. He is basically saying: If I don't like this artwork, the artwork is bad.

Reply
Dilan Abdah 12/08/2021 - 01:41 Reply
Alison Mike 12/08/2021 - 01:41

My art doesn't owe you anything, if you fail to see meaning in it maybe it's because there is none to see , whether I put any meaning in my painting is irrelevant ,if I did it's my meaning not yours . Mostly I paint because I like to paint , if people like my work I'm pleased but don't expect a painting that'll change your world ,it might change an empty wall space though.

Reply
snow white 12/08/2021 - 01:41

Most of the paintings are pretty bad and most of the music is lousy…like the guy so true and funny. thanks for sharing that causes us lots of anxiety now… 😉

Reply
Bob Star 12/08/2021 - 01:41

Ahh gatekeeping art by the academic and the "tastemakers" is THE most boring thing in the artworld. If you like it, great. If you don't, all good. Its between the viewer and the artist.

Reply
Jasmine Saunders 12/08/2021 - 01:41

This guys sucks.

Reply
Guy Indiman 12/08/2021 - 01:41

Long ago, my high school Art teacher said "There is no such thing as Good Art or Bad Art. There is only Art that you personally like or dislike. You cannot speak for the tastes of other people. Don't even try."

Reply
Sasha Whitehead 12/08/2021 - 01:41

Wow, 5:51 mins to hear that art shouldn't be boring, and should bring change to the viewer?

Reply
Aiden Cassaro 12/08/2021 - 01:41

They don't teach that in Art Schools, in fact, they say that there is no bad art, of course unless it's realism and is carrying the old traditions, then you're wrong and your art is bad and boring. Bad art is promoted. Big sad.

Reply
Jay la 12/08/2021 - 01:41

I would love to pick that guy's nose

Reply
Anna K 12/08/2021 - 01:41

Honestly, i dont think there is such a thing as bad art. sure, theres art that doesnt resonate with most people, but art is entirely subjective! its all made up by a bunch of dumb apes as a way to express ideas. What can move one person to tears can bore the crap out of another. If something sticks, it only really means it appeals to a lot of people, or at least the ones in charge of preserving the art, not that its somehow objectively great

Reply
The East Man 12/08/2021 - 01:41

Happy to see I'm not alone to be bored to death by most productions; they are simply bad. I think I'll sleep on it.

Reply
Smellman 12/08/2021 - 01:41

Almost all things that I defined as beautiful have not been paintings but moments. I suppose that is what a painting is supposed to be but in television I've often found things that impacted me quite well.

Reply
Varsha Sindhu 12/08/2021 - 01:41

Ugh… I detest this kind of snobbery. most art is bad only 1% is good. That’s not true!

Some art is great, some art is good, most art is average, some art is bad. Very few pieces of art will reach the metropolitan but there could be something hanging in your friends home that captivates you for a few minutes. Who can say that is bad?

Reply

Leave a Comment